"When in Rome" Nawm Nawm

"When in Rome, do as the Romans do..." I found it humors how Mitchell said Rome "eats gods", Meaning they are pretty much a "melting pot" to others beliefs (see what I did there, I'll try to stray more away from Jeremy's post now and go a completely different direction).

I'm finding it hard to figure out what to blog about because everything I think about leads me back to Roman America...

There was the comment about "Hearu h bell w ad oah the chs." At least that's what I heard the first few times. haha- "Head rules the belly with the Aid of the chest."

Na, how about this…

What about the whole Nature vs. Accident thing. I never really knew a better argument than "Well God sed it in thu Bibleeee" (I'm doing my Lucedale impression)
Haha. "It's just a guess but marriage might have a little something to do with procreation" Maybe Mitchell was trolling, but I think he's on to something. Nature vs. Accident. It doesn't take a skilled Biologist to know that two men can't naturally have children. Sometimes heterosexual relations also cannot procreate, but that is an issue with nature- not the accident, or whatever you'd call it when a guy thinks another guy is cute. To expound on the purpose of marriage even more, you marry someone so you can have a companion, a helper in your purpose and an aid in your ministry. But, then again, who cares about ministry as long as you are happy, satisfied and your pleasures are being met. If my sarcasm was confusing I am saying that just using the Nature vs. Accident argument is a good enough argument in itself in the whole “Gay Marriage” debate.

Commented on Jeremy’s